Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite Z930

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite Z930  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA SATELLITE Z930
Memory7.2 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '20 at 12:32
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
Socket BGA1023, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Memory 56.9
1-Core 34.3
2-Core 47.2
32% 46.1 Pts
4-Core 89.4
8-Core 87.9
12% 88.7 Pts
64-Core 88.4
6% 88.4 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 0004) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.04% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.6
3% 2.7 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.04%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO mSATA 250GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT44B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 283 278 278 280 281 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 443
Write 268
Mixed 283
SusWrite 279
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 19.6
77% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 185
139% 186 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
null MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
35.6% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite Z930 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite Z930

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback