Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire TC-895

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-895  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-895
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '20 at 23:31
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$123
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 89.2
1-Core 127
2-Core 251
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 722
73% 594 Pts
64-Core 1,067
66% 1,067 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 142C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.96% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 7.6
5% 7 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 10.8
7% 8.37 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.96%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 294 284 287 276 266 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 566
Write 824
Mixed 251
SusWrite 284
108% 481 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 30.3
104% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 229
174% 242 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 157%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S8HJ-8 ACR26D4U9S1KA-4 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 11.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 13.7
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-895 Builds (Compare 1,221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-895

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $123
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback