Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD PRO A4-4350B R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G 1,455 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Socket FT4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	35.9% Below average	Memory 61.4 1-Core 42.4 2-Core 66.2 38% 56.7 Pts	4-Core 62.2 8-Core 67.5 9% 64.8 Pts	64-Core 64.7 4% 64.7 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics 13,349 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 39F6) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.40.20.09 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	0.92% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.43 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.92% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 326 315 330 264 7.3 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Read 370 Write 313 Mixed 302 SusWrite 258 70% 311 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 57.2 4K Mixed 17.5 87% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 155 DQ Mixed 30.9 57% 113 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:0x9B05 CB8GS2400.C8ET 1x8GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	25.5% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 9.3 25% 8.77 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 7.7 20% 7 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
PRO A4-4350B R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3GAMDBench 31%, 1,455 samples	259x
PRO A6-7350B R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3GAMDBench 32%, 63 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	259x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	3x

RAM
RMSA3260MF68H9F-2666 1x4GBRAMAXELBench 22%, 773 samples	151x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	74x
HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x4GBHynixBench 32%, 9,575 samples	12x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16