Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics82% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL X99
Memory43.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '20 at 22:10
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 190
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 648
62% 514 Pts
64-Core 1,029
64% 1,029 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 114
Parallax 189
88% 137 fps
MRender 87.4
Gravity 103
Splatting 70
70% 86.9 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 82%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB
504GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 435 453 456 454 453 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 423
Mixed 324
SusWrite 446
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 43.9
144% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 229
204% 308 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 106%
Great: 115%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
2GB free, PID 1665, Kingson DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 1.9 1.6 2.9 3.3 1.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
4.87% Terrible
Read 17.4
Write 3.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 2.4
8% 7.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.87%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BRBP1G48G16C2400 BRBP1G48G16C2400 48GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.5% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 6.2
20% 7 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 7.7
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,825 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback