Lenovo 20251

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20251  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Ginkgo 7A
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '20 at 17:44
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 81.7
2-Core 143
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 208
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3910) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.1% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 2.7
3% 4.07 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.1%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dierya 500GB 500GB
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 342 390 354 389 390 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 429
Mixed 400
SusWrite 372
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 34.6
107% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 120
154% 276 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1L16BC2P1-B1FS RMT3170EB68F9W1600 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.6% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 15.8
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 14.9
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20251 Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20251

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback