Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu MS-7293VP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu MS-7293VP  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU MS-7293VP
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070309
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 04 '20 at 17:10
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6300-$40
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Memory 51.2
1-Core 19.7
2-Core 33.6
25% 34.8 Pts
4-Core 35.6
8-Core 37.3
5% 36.4 Pts
64-Core 36.8
2% 36.8 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X1550
Sapphire(174B 5920) 64MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.11% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 0.1
Parallax 0.3
0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.11%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS542516K9SA00 160GB-$298
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBCOC31P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 7.7 6.6 7.9 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
6.27% Terrible
Read 12
Write 22.3
Mixed 9.6
SusWrite 9.6
10% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.27%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.35% Terrible
MC Read 3
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 2.3
8% 2.67 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 2.2
8% 2.97 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.35%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7293VP Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu MS-7293VP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $75
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback