PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Intel X99 (all builds) |
Memory | 25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200417 |
Uptime | 2.2 Days |
Run Date | Dec 04 '20 at 23:02 |
Run Duration | 192 Seconds |
Run User | SAU-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
|
67.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
158%
Outstanding
|
|||
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$449
EVGA(3842 4993) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.55
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown TYA4U2400D17161C 2x16GB
2 of 24 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples | 234x |
Xeon E5-2678 v3IntelBench 71%, 6,301 samples | 183x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples | 127x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $131Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 153x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $282Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 137x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $218Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 103x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 94% - Outstanding | Total price: $131 |