Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Toshiba Satellite L855 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130422
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '20 at 13:58
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 82.5 1-Core 90.9 2-Core 182 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 445 46% 368 Pts	64-Core 450 28% 450 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M 7,895 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FB22) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	4.9% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 6.5 Parallax 5.4 5% 6.07 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 5.6 4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.9% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 390GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3Z40107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 327 313 313 312 309 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Read 353 Write 308 Mixed 279 SusWrite 320 71% 315 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 62 4K Mixed 18.3 88% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 21.4 DQ Write 91.8 DQ Mixed 22.1 27% 45.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI 8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	55.2% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 17.5 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 17.1 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 76 53% 76 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	105x
Radeon HD 7600MAMDBench 4%, 7,895 samples	85x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	4x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	13x
M471B5173BH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,461 samples	11x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	10x

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $448