Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Memory 92.8 1-Core 102 2-Core 203 77% 133 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 508 55% 436 Pts	64-Core 508 32% 508 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Gigabyte(1458 3542) 2GB CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Lighting 35 Reflection 36.2 Parallax 46.3 28% 39.2 fps	MRender 47.3 Gravity 44.4 Splatting 36.2 34% 42.6 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 789GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 18 18 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 28.5 Write 15.5 Mixed 13.7 SusWrite 18 14% 18.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 23% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 71GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 110 112 111 110 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 89.7 Write 93.3 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 110 63% 85.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 88%
WD WD40EJRX-89T1XY0 4TB 414 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 89 93 90 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 98 Write 96.2 Mixed 64 SusWrite 88.9 64% 86.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 16GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 17.5 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 17.4 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	32x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	29x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	26x

SSD
WDS2 40G2G0A-00JH30 240GBWDCBench 44%, 768 samples	21x
SSD 120GBGigabyte $30Bench 70%, 13,685 samples	10x
A400 480GBKingston $31Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	8x

RAM
KVR16N11/8 1x8GBKingstonBench 29%, 181 samples	13x
KVR16N11/8 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 276 samples	10x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	8x