Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4P-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-UD4P-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150204
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateDec 07 '20 at 10:15
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User SYC-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 107
2-Core 205
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 662
65% 533 Pts
64-Core 842
52% 842 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro R5000 (FireGL V)
AMD(1002 0B04) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1001.0
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 28.2
Parallax 22.4
13% 22.3 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 20.5
16% 19.9 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 444 452 446 448 444 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 439
Mixed 353
SusWrite 441
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 28.5
104% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 349
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
136GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 452 454 450 454 453 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 414
Mixed 342
SusWrite 450
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 33.5
118% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 350
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TS1GLH64V1H 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
68.4% Good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 22.2
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 20.3
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-UD4P-CF Builds (Compare 226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4P-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback