| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 40.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 63% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190813 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 08 '20 at 08:51 |
| Run Duration | 116 Seconds |
| Run User | NZL-User |
| Background CPU | 51% |
PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
73.9%
Very good
|
76% 136 Pts
|
57% 441 Pts
|
29% 473 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E343) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
40.9%
Average
|
41% 56.7 fps
|
41% 51.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 149 169 185 178 197 MB/s
|
63%
Good
|
53% 240 MB/s
|
86% 30.2 MB/s
|
102% 186 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD2 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
28.7%
Poor
|
27% 9.53 GB/s
|
23% 7.97 GB/s
|
46% 87.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,778 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,097x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 947x |
| Core i3-8100Intel $68Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 282x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 361x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 299x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 237x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 100% - Outstanding | Total price: $241 |