Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 10B4S3CB00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 10B4S3CB00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '17 at 09:33
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
42.1% Average
Memory 56
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 146
55% 96.6 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 176
22% 169 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3098) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3412
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.33% Terrible
Lighting 2.77
Reflection 3.65
Parallax 3.19
2% 3.2 fps
MRender 3.76
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.87
2% 2.92 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.33%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 LENOVO 500GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA7R0
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 159
Mixed 39.5
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.2
72% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5030KE68F9F1600 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.6% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 7.5
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 5.6
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback