Today's hottest deals

HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory18.7 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 12 '17 at 11:07
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 130
60% 95.7 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 518
46% 390 Pts
64-Core 1,026
64% 1,026 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 580
Nvidia(10DE 063A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 337.88
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.84% Terrible
Lighting 1.87
Reflection 3.85
Parallax 0.72
2% 2.14 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 1.37
Splatting 2.96
2% 3.06 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.84%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.6% Below average
Read 200
Write 154
Mixed 157
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 17.4
67% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 28
DQ Write 46.3
DQ Mixed 17.7
19% 30.7 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 21.9
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.1
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,231 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback