Fujitsu ESPRIMO E710

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO E710  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3161-A1
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '20 at 16:39
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 89
1-Core 77.9
2-Core 156
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 226
24% 193 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 400A) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 5
4% 5.23 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$20
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 101 120 270 80 218 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 402
Write 73
Mixed 310
SusWrite 194
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 28.3
106% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 181
160% 238 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$23
233GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 120 121 121 122 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69% Good
Read 120
Write 108
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 120
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 69%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 M378B5773CH0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.1% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.3
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO E710 Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback