Today's hottest deals

Asus S551LN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
7 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus S551LN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK S551LN
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '17 at 18:57
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4510U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 84.6
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 135
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 199
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 130D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3496
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 9.69
Parallax 5.34
3% 6.33 fps
MRender 4.33
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 6.26
4% 4.21 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTE256HMHP-000 256GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT46K0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 500
Write 259
Mixed 325
80% 361 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 93.3
4K Mixed 18
129% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 40.2
101% 214 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 86%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
627GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 76
Write 77.5
Mixed 77.8
58% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.34
86% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 1315 CT102464BF160B.M16 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.7% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 8.4
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S551LN Builds (Compare 317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus S551LN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback