Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S7  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3099-A1
Memory29.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 12 '20 at 19:22
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2430 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 76
1-Core 70.7
2-Core 137
57% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 434
42% 346 Pts
64-Core 934
58% 934 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI RAID 5/6 SAS 6G 1TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 104 105 105 105 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
213% Outstanding
Read 638
Write 104
Mixed 104
SusWrite 105
173% 238 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.4
336% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 213%
Great: 213%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
7GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 6.5 6.6 7.2 4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
9.27% Terrible
Read 28.2
Write 25.1
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 6
19% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.9
113% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.27%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70QB0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4A 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.8% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.1
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIMERGY TX200 S7 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $91
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback