Asrock H61M-DGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '20 at 02:08
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$147
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 92.4
2-Core 183
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 417
44% 354 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1373 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.3
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Lighting 68.5
Reflection 58.4
Parallax 83.3
56% 70.1 fps
MRender 59.7
Gravity 68.2
Splatting 43.3
45% 57.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
280GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 239 236 238 240 239 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
72.9% Very good
Read 254
Write 237
Mixed 237
SusWrite 237
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 39.4
126% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 196
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 133%
Walgreen Infinitive 16GB
7GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 1.8 1.8 2 1.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
7.31% Terrible
Read 29.8
Write 3.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 1.7
8% 9.38 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.8
94% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.31%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3 1600 029E CMX8GX3M1A1600C11 16GB
1067, 1067 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.3% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 12.6
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-DGS Builds (Compare 1,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DGS - $68

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback