Blade Shadow Computer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemBlade Shadow Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardBlade ShadowM
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 13 '20 at 23:32
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-3235
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 221
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 544
58% 460 Pts
64-Core 568
35% 568 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000
Nvidia(10DE 129F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 169
Parallax 172
139% 170 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 148
Splatting 135
123% 153 fps
Poor: 122%
This bench: 127%
Great: 137%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 119 114 111 108 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 500
Write 106
Mixed 201
SusWrite 113
50% 230 MB/s
4K Read 82.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 6.6
136% 30.9 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 108%
Qemu HARDDISK 825GB
411GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 119 119 119 119 119 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Blade 2I0NSNTQNP8K77-0N3 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 60.8
MC Mixed 26.2
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 8.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Shadow Computer Builds (Compare 608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Blade Shadow Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback