Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 87 1-Core 69.5 2-Core 157 62% 104 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 372 43% 334 Pts	64-Core 379 24% 379 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Lighting 40.6 Reflection 40.9 Parallax 37.8 33% 39.8 fps	MRender 36.3 Gravity 41.6 Splatting 27.5 28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$40 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 457 Write 412 Mixed 408 95% 426 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 52.6 4K Mixed 29.9 105% 36.1 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 355 DQ Mixed 295 242% 346 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KRE-D3S1600M/8G Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.6% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 17.2 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16.5 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 70.4 57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	105x
GeForce GT 520MNvidiaBench 2%, 5,654 samples	45x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	4x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x

RAM
ASU1333S9-4G-ECEWG 1x4GBKingstonBench 27%, 555 samples	18x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	11x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 33%, 8,194 samples	8x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $188