Lenovo 20N2006JPB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20N2006JPB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20N2006JPB
Memory4.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200921
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 14 '20 at 12:38
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 18%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
24% Poor
Memory 41.7
1-Core 12.5
2-Core 21.4
19% 25.2 Pts
4-Core 36
8-Core 49.7
5% 42.8 Pts
64-Core 54.5
3% 54.5 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 24%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Legend(17AA 2278) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.56% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.9
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 0.9
1% 0.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.56%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M8Se NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
754GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 566 416 455 298 389 370 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 690
Write 758
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 416
107% 481 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 16.3
53% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 79.5
DQ Write 66
DQ Mixed 73.4
55% 73 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 187%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FDD 24GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
23.4% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 10.9
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.33 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback