Today's hottest deals

Dell PowerEdge T320

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory26GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 26GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell PowerEdge T320
MotherboardDell PowerEdge T320  (all builds)
Memory21.9 GB free of 26 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150129
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 15 '20 at 03:50
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1410 v2
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
41.2% Average
Memory 62.4
1-Core 32.5
2-Core 62
35% 52.3 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 416
28% 262 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
PNY(196E 097A) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.5% Poor
Lighting 29.6
Reflection 34.1
Parallax 41.6
24% 35.1 fps
MRender 45.6
Gravity 36.4
Splatting 33.7
31% 38.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-128M2S 128GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 179 178 185 186 178 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.5% Below average
Read 220
Write 180
Mixed 178
SusWrite 181
43% 189 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 13.8
47% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 79
DQ Write 57.1
DQ Mixed 58.3
46% 64.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 54%
Intel S3500 Series 120GB
46GB free
Firmware: D2010374
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 120 119 137 136 133 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47% Average
Read 219
Write 138
Mixed 152
SusWrite 130
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 20.6
75% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 166
124% 166 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 47%
Great: 73%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
8GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3W0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 99 98 99 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 66.3
Write 61.5
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 97.8
44% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT42GR7BFR4A-PB 01980097 9965439-029.A00LF 01980097 9965439-029.A00LF 01980097 9965439-029.A00LF 01980097 9965439-029.A00LF 01980097 9965439-029.A00LF 26GB
1600, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
16384, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.3% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 9.8
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PowerEdge T320 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge T320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback