Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX100 S3 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3009-A1
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120220
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 16 '20 at 18:27
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31220-$305 2,507 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 85.8 1-Core 87.9 2-Core 163 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 332 44% 331 Pts	64-Core 331 20% 331 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Lighting 18.2 Reflection 18.6 Parallax 18.8 15% 18.5 fps	MRender 15.7 Gravity 19.1 Splatting 17.1 14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB 830 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 202 77 144 206 153 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5273DH0-YK0 M391B5273DH0-YH9 Nanya NT4GC72C8PG0NF-DI M391B5273DH0-YH9 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.5% Above average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 16.6 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	2x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	2x

SSD
Agility 3 240GBOCZ $199Bench 52%, 10,165 samples	2x
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	1x
X300 256GBSanDisk $99Bench 79%, 2,341 samples	1x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-YH9 M391B5273DH0-YH9 8GBSamsungBench 51%, 10 samples	3x
CT51272BA1339.M18F Samsung M391B5273DH0-YH9 CT51272BA1339.M18F Samsung M391B5273DH0-YH9 16GBUnknownBench 49%, 3 samples	2x
M391B1G73BH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 73%, 170 samples	1x

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $504