Today's hottest deals

IBM System x3650 -[7979C3U]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemIBM System x3650 -[7979C3U]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM System Planar
Memory3.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '20 at 18:59
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5355
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.8% Average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 30.3
2-Core 61.7
37% 53.7 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 247
22% 185 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Dell(1028 3243) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
1.27% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 0.8
1% 1.4 fps
MRender 1.2
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.27%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 147GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 50 45 50 50 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 88.5
Write 50.5
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 48.8
45% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.3
225% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 12 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
13% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 4.1
10% 3.67 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback