Today's hottest deals

Asus GT51CA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus GT51CA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GT51CA
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display5848 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '20 at 16:21
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90% Excellent
Memory 87.9
1-Core 145
2-Core 272
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 778
78% 636 Pts
64-Core 780
48% 780 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90%
Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$69
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 681 606 592 558 557 540 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1802
Write 1,002
Mixed 948
SusWrite 589
241% 1,085 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 56.1
215% 79.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,169
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 486
422% 652 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 206%
Great: 262%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 183 183 183 182 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 158
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 181
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
ASMT 2105 64GB
44GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 76 80 60 59 52 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 226
Write 110
Mixed 140
SusWrite 70.9
166% 137 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 14.8
1,833% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 19.3
DQ Write 38.5
DQ Mixed 15.4
1,905% 24.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 167%
Great: 167%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
72.6% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 22.7
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 23.5
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 69.6
57% 69.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GT51CA Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

System: Asus GT51CA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $392
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback