Today's hottest deals

Asus A88X-GAMER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus A88X-GAMER  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 1075 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 20 '20 at 18:23
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 80.4
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 137
59% 96.6 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 210
30% 219 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B E249) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.4% Poor
Lighting 38.1
Reflection 32
Parallax 49.4
31% 39.8 fps
MRender 28.3
Gravity 36.7
Splatting 22.4
23% 29.1 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct240bx5 0 240GB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 89 154 160 117 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 408
Write 345
Mixed 338
SusWrite 168
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 7.8
DQ Mixed 0.4
29% 77.2 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 87%
WDC WD64 00AAVS-00G9B1 640GB
349GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 31 31 31 31 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.7% Very poor
Read 33.6
Write 28
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 30.6
40% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
111% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2400C10-4GTX 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
44.2% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 18.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 13.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88X-GAMER Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus A88X-GAMER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback