Monster TULPAR T5

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Monster TULPAR T5 (all builds)
Motherboard	Monster TULPAR T5
Memory	28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141201
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 21 '20 at 12:43
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4910MQ-$110 6,703 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Memory 79.1 1-Core 120 2-Core 236 80% 145 Pts	4-Core 439 8-Core 604 66% 521 Pts	64-Core 603 37% 603 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) 258,091 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 0000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5166 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.59% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 7.1 3% 4.63 fps	MRender 8.1 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 5.1 4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.59% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 250GB 4,026 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT41B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 313 315 316 312 309 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 468 Mixed 385 SusWrite 328 94% 419 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 57.3 194% 67.7 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 178 142% 200 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 118%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 627GB free Firmware: AX001F SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 66 66 67 67 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 68.8 Write 68.4 Mixed 26.2 SusWrite 66.8 42% 57.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 Micron OEM MONSTER M471B1G73BH0-YK0 Kingston 9905428-435.A00LF 32GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	56% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 15.8 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 22.2 SC Mixed 20.3 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 82.2 49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T5 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T5

CPU
Core i7-4710MQIntel $48Bench 60%, 15,557 samples	19x
Core i7-4910MQIntel $110Bench 67%, 6,703 samples	7x
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	14x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	8x
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples	6x

SSD
850 EVO mSATA 250GBSamsungBench 95%, 4,026 samples	8x
PLUS 480GBSSDBench 87%, 5,109 samples	3x
Fury 120GBHyperX $160Bench 64%, 11,403 samples	2x

RAM
2x8GBGKH800SO51208-1600Bench 54%, 664 samples	9x
HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GBKingstonBench 67%, 701 samples	7x
OEM MONSTER 1x8GBMicronBench 30%, 70 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $48

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16