ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper M3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper M3-CF (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130429
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 06 '15 at 22:08
Run Duration	322 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.3 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 105 2-Core 204 71% 155 Pts	4-Core 382 8-Core 387 51% 384 Pts	64-Core 400 25% 400 Pts
Poor: 44% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% AMD(1002 0B00) 3GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.4% Below average	Lighting 42.8 Reflection 29.8 Parallax 57.7 35% 43.4 fps	MRender 28.2 Gravity 45.9 Splatting 37.2 31% 37.1 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0309 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 19159 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 899 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 86 (AE) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 11136929236331 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 80 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 98 98 2 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	60.7% Good	Read 484 Write 192 Mixed 271 69% 316 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 72.5 4K Mixed 8.63 85% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 11.3 40% 87.9 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 72%
OCZ ONYX 32GB 164 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 48GB free Firmware: 1.7 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 6 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 21 48 0 (0C) Power cycle count 142 0 0 (B8) Unknown 11 0 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 0 0 0 (C4) Reallocation count 0 0 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 0 0 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 93 162 32326 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 157 209 31282 (C8) Write error rate 118 57 832 (C9) Soft read error rate 89 97 1242 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 154 52 109 (CB) Run out cancel 163 228 100 (CC) Soft ECC correction 0 0 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 136 19 0 (CE) Flying height 124 0 0 (CF) Spin high current 184 2 0 (D0) Spin buzz 153 1 0 (D1) Offline seek performance 92 0 0 (D3) Unknown 0 0 0 (D4) Unknown 0 0 0 (D5) Unknown 0 0 0	34.8% Below average	Read 231 Write 113 Mixed 127 34% 157 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 11.6 4K Mixed 6.82 56% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 11.1 DQ Mixed 8.67 20% 44.7 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 26%
OCZ ONYX 32GB 164 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 48GB free Firmware: 1.7 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 6 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 247 26 0 (0C) Power cycle count 59 1 0 (B8) Unknown 17 0 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 0 0 0 (C4) Reallocation count 0 0 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 0 0 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 192 31 20067 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 85 10 16737 (C8) Write error rate 37 222 603 (C9) Soft read error rate 182 40 587 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 178 133 29 (CB) Run out cancel 168 118 28 (CC) Soft ECC correction 0 0 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 136 19 0 (CE) Flying height 3 0 0 (CF) Spin high current 27 1 0 (D0) Spin buzz 69 0 0 (D1) Offline seek performance 99 0 0 (D3) Unknown 0 0 0 (D4) Unknown 0 0 0 (D5) Unknown 0 0 0	34.9% Below average	Read 239 Write 113 Mixed 131 35% 161 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 11.3 4K Mixed 6.09 55% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 11.8 DQ Mixed 8.38 20% 45.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 26%
ST310005 28AS 1TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 930GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Read 33 Write 27.6 Mixed 14.2 30% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.46 69% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 48%
WDC WD75 00AARX-00N0YB0 750GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 699GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.5% Very poor	Read 32.1 Write 27.7 Mixed 30.2 38% 30 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.19 60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 16%
ST950032 5AS 500GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 466GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 32 Write 28.1 Mixed 15.4 30% 25.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.57 4K Mixed 0.23 29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 33%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 116GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 28.4 Mixed 14.3 30% 24.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.35 60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GA-G1.Sniper M3-CF Builds (Compare 230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper M3-CF

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $93Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	87x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	46x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	32x

GPU
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	22x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	22x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	18x

SSD
MZ7KM960HMJP0D3 960GBBench 99%, 133 samples	27x
MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 85%, 3,736 samples	11x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $70Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	10x

RAM
CMX4GX3M2A1600C7 029E CM3X2G1600C8 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 029E CM3X2G1600C8 8GBUnknownBench 60%, 17 samples	17x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 74%, 7,519 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $282

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback