Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision WorkStation T5400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T5400  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0RW203
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120430
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateDec 25 '20 at 18:46
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5460
CPU, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 69.4
1-Core 43.6
2-Core 88.1
43% 67 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 359
32% 270 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 20.3
17% 19.5 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 22
Splatting 16.4
17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 480GB-$38
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS9006B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 69 128 65 47 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.2% Poor
Read 156
Write 83.7
Mixed 106
SusWrite 92.7
24% 110 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 13.7
54% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 26.3
DQ Write 13.6
DQ Mixed 16.6
13% 18.8 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.6% Poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 9.1
21% 7.3 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 4.4
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T5400 Builds (Compare 234 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T5400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback