Asus G11CD-K

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus G11CD-K (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G11CD-K
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161125
Uptime	7.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 25 '20 at 19:52
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$70 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 110 2-Core 195 77% 132 Pts	4-Core 421 8-Core 144 44% 283 Pts	64-Core 366 23% 366 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 200B) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.8% Above average	Lighting 63.7 Reflection 65.9 Parallax 67 52% 65.5 fps	MRender 63.9 Gravity 65.1 Splatting 60.4 51% 63.1 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 274GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKK1B3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 390 420 433 440 276 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Read 371 Write 400 Mixed 302 SusWrite 385 82% 364 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 80.3 4K Mixed 31.5 126% 46.6 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 309 DQ Mixed 166 153% 232 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 928GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 176 179 182 182 181 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 190 Write 181 Mixed 94.5 SusWrite 179 118% 161 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 217% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 859B CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBD1 16GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	60.4% Good	MC Read 19.3 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 18.6 62% 21.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 16.8 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G11CD-K Builds (Compare 1,760 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus G11CD-K

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	925x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	739x
Core i7-7700KIntel $247Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	459x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	299x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	242x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBBench 78%, 6,868 samples	146x
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	141x
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples	115x

RAM
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 21,551 samples	174x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples	163x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	126x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $171

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16