Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1495
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111110
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 25 '20 at 23:39
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 84.7 2-Core 169 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 312 43% 320 Pts	64-Core 324 20% 324 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.9% Poor	Lighting 37.8 Reflection 41.8 Parallax 38.9 31% 39.5 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 39.6 Splatting 28.1 28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
3 240GB SSD 240GB 3,846 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1120A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 35 8.5 94 13 17 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.1% Poor	Read 256 Write 207 Mixed 14.2 SusWrite 51 29% 132 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 10.4 4K Mixed 0.3 22% 7.03 MB/s	DQ Read 77.5 DQ Write 13.3 DQ Mixed 0.3 12% 30.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 99%
Seagate ST3250310CS 250GB-$33 3,279 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 198GB free Firmware: 3.ACD SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 100 100 100 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	53.3% Above average	Read 88.5 Write 100 Mixed 46 SusWrite 97.1 61% 82.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 328GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 159 188 187 185 187 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	Read 157 Write 154 Mixed 68 SusWrite 177 101% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4G1 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 16JTF25664AZ-1G4G1 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.2% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 15.9 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 14.5 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,776x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	276x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	239x

RAM
9905584-014.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 436 samples	38x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	37x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	22x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16