ADD TO PC
BUILD

Clevo W25xHPW

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Clevo W25xHPW (all builds)
Motherboard	CLEVO W25xHPW
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20110829
Uptime	5.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '20 at 01:58
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 87.8 1-Core 81.2 2-Core 156 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 344 41% 315 Pts	64-Core 336 21% 336 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Clevo(1558 2500) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.62% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 1.4 2% 1.9 fps	MRender 2.5 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.62% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNS256GCSP 256GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: TA5ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 255 292 290 287 211 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	78.8% Very good	Read 406 Write 347 Mixed 332 SusWrite 268 76% 338 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 49 4K Mixed 32.6 105% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 300 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 314 232% 304 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 88%
Kingmax USB2.0 FlashDisk 16GB 221 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 11GB free, PID 3257 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 6.5 6.5 5.9 6.5 6.5 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	4.88% Terrible	Read 17.8 Write 3.2 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 6.2 10% 8.75 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.88% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Asint SSA302G08-GDJ1C 2x4GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	51% Above average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 16.2 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback