Blade Shadow Computer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemBlade Shadow Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardBlade ShadowM
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '20 at 06:40
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-3235
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 190
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 598
60% 490 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000
Nvidia(10DE 129F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 174
Parallax 177
145% 177 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 154
Splatting 144
129% 159 fps
Poor: 122%
This bench: 132%
Great: 137%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 134 138 139 126 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 108%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 172GB
109GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 60 60 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 70
Mixed 502
SusWrite 66.6
63% 285 MB/s
4K Read 67.9
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 65.8
222% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 409
DQ Write 387
DQ Mixed 389
294% 395 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%
Qemu HARDDISK 550GB
209GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 60 60 60 60 60 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Blade 34S1895GWQRUBI-JZT 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
113% Outstanding
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 70.5
MC Mixed 39
132% 46.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 9.4
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Shadow Computer Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Blade Shadow Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback