Today's hottest deals

HP 870-224

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 870-224  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F1
Memory4.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170330
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 27 '20 at 04:00
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
29.8% Poor
Memory 23.8
1-Core 12.2
2-Core 85.4
20% 40.5 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 225
28% 214 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$115
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.9% Above average
Lighting 63.3
Reflection 60.1
Parallax 67.6
52% 63.7 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 66.3
Splatting 61.3
53% 64.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ1A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 72 188 47 36 34 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.4% Average
Read 199
Write 270
Mixed 217
SusWrite 93.9
44% 195 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 31.5
4K Mixed 15.9
62% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 175
158% 238 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
422GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 137 136 136 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 135
Write 143
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 135
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.3% Below average
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 15.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 6.1
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 293
14% 293 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870-224 Builds (Compare 685 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: HP 870-224

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback