Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Novatech PC-1761D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Novatech PC-1761D (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z87-HD3
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140120
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '20 at 10:02
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$75 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 112 2-Core 201 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 582 53% 444 Pts	64-Core 578 36% 578 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% EVGA(3842 3061) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Lighting 22.7 Reflection 27 Parallax 31.5 18% 27.1 fps	MRender 33.1 Gravity 29.1 Splatting 24.5 23% 28.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 249GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 40 39 41 33 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 (TurboPC EX) 2TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 162 170 172 170 165 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Read 164 Write 177 Mixed 46.9 SusWrite 168 101% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 134% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 100%
WD WD10EZEX-00BN5A0 (TurboPC EX) 1TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 715GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 45 45 45 31 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	62.9% Good	Read 177 Write 41.3 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 42.1 55% 75.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.8 162% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 102%
WD 10EACS External 1TB 353 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 282GB free, PID 1001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 40 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Read 39.5 Write 38.7 Mixed 30.4 SusWrite 40.8 51% 37.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 111% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1600KLH-8G 2x8GB 905 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 16.9 57% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 16.5 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback