Asrock FM2A78 Pro4+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A78 Pro4+  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '17 at 10:42
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 134
59% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 216
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
ASRock(1849 9901) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1065.0
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
3.38% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 6
Parallax 6.78
3% 5.56 fps
MRender 2.57
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 4.87
4% 4.51 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.38%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor 6L200M0 204GB-$44
53GB free
Firmware: BANC1G10 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 59.6
Write 57.8
Mixed 55.7
44% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 3.16
4K Mixed 0.47
137% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 35%
Maxtor 6E040T0 40GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: NAN51680 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 47.3
Write 48.9
Mixed 41.4
34% 45.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.19
64% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 7.2
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A78 Pro4+ Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A78 Pro4+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $467
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback