Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics73.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory20.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '20 at 07:15
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 86.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 203
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 788
70% 593 Pts
64-Core 1,004
62% 1,004 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.4% Very good
Lighting 90.4
Reflection 101
Parallax 91.6
74% 94.2 fps
MRender 89.3
Gravity 88.3
Splatting 88.8
73% 88.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 149 137 158 162 156 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 320
Write 175
Mixed 244
SusWrite 151
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 36.1
129% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 246
179% 232 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
25GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 87 89 90 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 127
Write 120
Mixed 61
SusWrite 88.6
73% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 88%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
250GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 81 82 81 81 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 89.7
Write 77.8
Mixed 59
SusWrite 80.5
57% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 63%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
763GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 84 82 83 85 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 79
Write 79.5
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 83
55% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G70BH0- 3x8GB
3 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70% Good
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 24
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,999 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback