Asus A85XM-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A85XM-A  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130315
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateMay 22 '17 at 21:25
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 78.5
1-Core 66.2
2-Core 134
56% 92.8 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 221
29% 217 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8670D
Asus(1043 8526) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
6.09% Terrible
Lighting 7.77
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 7.47
6% 7.91 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 6.67
Splatting 8.22
6% 6.64 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.09%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
653GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 159
Mixed 145
118% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.3
106% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 112%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 0GB
0GB free, PID 7101
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
2.4% Terrible
Read 7.33
Write 5.79
Mixed 4.21
7% 5.78 MB/s
4K Read 0.03
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.01
1% 0.02 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.4%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
33.6% Below average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 11.6
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 10.7
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A85XM-A Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A85XM-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $549
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback