PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Dell Precision T1500 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T1500 (all builds) |
Memory | 15.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110113 |
Uptime | 0.9 Days |
Run Date | May 23 '17 at 14:26 |
Run Duration | 118 Seconds |
Run User | IDN-User |
Background CPU | 27% |
CPU Throttled | 85% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
57.2%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro FX 580
Nvidia(10DE 063A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.61
|
2%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
46.8%
Average
|
||||
78.7%
Very good
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM 1600 MHz
|
34.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 860Intel $200Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 157x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 125x |
Core i5-750Intel $60Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 65x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 35x |
Quadro FX 580NvidiaBench 2%, 5,936 samples | 34x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $90Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 24x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $284 |