Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20A8S00805

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 77% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20A8S00805  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20A8S00805
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140902
Uptime17.7 Days
Run DateDec 30 '20 at 13:51
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 28%
CPU Throttled 77%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4600U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 73.3
1-Core 57.6
2-Core 92.9
48% 74.6 Pts
4-Core 23.3
8-Core 55.6
4% 39.4 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2218) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
1.89% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 1.2
2% 1.47 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 3
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.89%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTE256HMHP-000L7 256GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT28L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 142 151 142 151 155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 398
Write 251
Mixed 171
SusWrite 150
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 21.3
80% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 78.2
108% 200 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT851S6AMR6R-PB N0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Chip DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
35.9% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 0.7
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback