Apple iMac18,3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple iMac18,3  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-BE088AF8C5EB4FA2
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201103
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 30 '20 at 22:20
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 85.9
1-Core 122
2-Core 238
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 471
59% 447 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 570
Apple(106B 0163) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1695 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.36.01
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.9% Below average
Lighting 45.1
Reflection 49.4
Parallax 56.2
37% 50.2 fps
MRender 51.4
Gravity 42.5
Splatting 34.8
34% 42.9 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingbank KP320 1TB
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 318 303 305 307 305 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.9% Above average
Read 332
Write 334
Mixed 325
SusWrite 315
74% 326 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 17.1
59% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 76.7
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 98.7
72% 93.7 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x344154463531323634485A2D3247334532202020 0x59B 0x4354344734534653383234302E4338464432020 0x802C 0x344154463531323634485A2D3247334532202020 0x59B 0x4354344734534653383234302E4338464432020 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 26.7
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 20.8
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac18,3 Builds (Compare 430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Apple iMac18,3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback