Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67-M LX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M LX  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110211
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateDec 31 '20 at 03:43
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$142
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 83.8
2-Core 167
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 296
42% 306 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.5% Poor
Lighting 37.1
Reflection 41.4
Parallax 42.8
30% 40.4 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 38.9
Splatting 27.8
28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TP01000GB 1TB
532GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.V05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 92 97 104 104 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 80.7
Write 80.9
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 94.4
62% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 64C0MHHHJ-HS 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 15.1
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M LX Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $64
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback