Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '21 at 12:55
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 71.6
1-Core 149
2-Core 298
91% 173 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 828
82% 668 Pts
64-Core 1,101
68% 1,101 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.8% Above average
Lighting 65.7
Reflection 63.8
Parallax 88.3
54% 72.6 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 69.9
Splatting 47.6
48% 60.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA17.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 161 164 164 167 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 461
Write 144
Mixed 338
SusWrite 191
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 38.3
146% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 158
122% 167 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 90%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
472GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 81 83 85 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 76.2
Write 76
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 82.9
55% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 57%
Terra USThree 16GB
10GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 31 33 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 113
Write 33.8
Mixed 15.9
SusWrite 28.9
50% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.1
81% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.5% Good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.8
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 24.8
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 11,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $1,369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback