| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 38.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Micro-Star MS-7A36 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M PRO-VD/S V2 (MS-7A36) (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190122 |
| Uptime | 0.9 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 01 '21 at 13:58 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | THA-User |
| Background CPU | 36% |
PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
51%
Above average
|
56% 98.1 Pts
|
32% 243 Pts
|
14% 233 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Zotac(19DA 2595) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
38.4%
Below average
|
44% 55.7 fps
|
28% 38.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 26 13 13 94 107 MB/s
|
40.3%
Average
|
54% 243 MB/s
|
56% 19.7 MB/s
|
40% 72 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
289GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 63 70 72 69 MB/s
|
46.6%
Average
|
59% 80.2 MB/s
|
164% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown GD2.0942WS.001 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.6%
Below average
|
31% 10.9 GB/s
|
34% 11.8 GB/s
|
32% 125 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M PRO-VD/S V2 (MS-7A36) Builds (Compare 204 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VD/S V2 (MS-7A36)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 36x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 32x |
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 17x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 25x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 18x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 14x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $249 |