Lenovo 43517Q1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 43517Q1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory58.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '21 at 15:23
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2665 0
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 63.8
2-Core 156
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 542
51% 425 Pts
64-Core 736
46% 736 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Lighting 67
Reflection 68.4
Parallax 62.4
55% 65.9 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 68.3
Splatting 61.7
53% 65.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
479GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 421 431 426 422 422 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Read 431
Write 418
Mixed 382
SusWrite 386
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 40.3
131% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 359
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,347
Write 4,230
Mixed 3,604
906% 4,060 MB/s
4K Read 203
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 130
540% 152 MB/s
DQ Read 590
DQ Write 448
DQ Mixed 503
381% 514 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4C Samsung M393B1G70QH0- HMT31GR7CFR4C Samsung M393B1G70QH0- HMT31GR7CFR4C Samsung M393B1G70QH0- HMT31GR7CFR4C Samsung M393B1G70QH0- 64GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
89.6% Excellent
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 33.1
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.5
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 43517Q1 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: Lenovo 43517Q1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback