Asus GL702VMK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus GL702VMK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL702VMK
Memory21.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '21 at 20:07
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 225
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 533
60% 473 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1760) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49% Average
Lighting 58.9
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 60.5
48% 63.3 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 60.4
Splatting 62.1
51% 62.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 112 139 137 139 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 400
Write 338
Mixed 274
SusWrite 137
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 10.1
56% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 95.8
DQ Mixed 11.6
33% 71.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 55%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
886GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 113 114 114 115 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 114
Write 122
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 114
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CRC M471A1K43BB0-CPB 24GB
2400, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.7% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 21.9
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 22.4
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL702VMK Builds (Compare 416 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Asus GL702VMK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback