Today's hottest deals

Apple MacPro7,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics209% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemApple MacPro7,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-27AD2F918AE68F61
Memory59 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '21 at 00:47
Run Duration101 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-3223
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 72
1-Core 122
2-Core 246
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 935
84% 710 Pts
64-Core 1,257
78% 1,257 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,275
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
209% Outstanding
Lighting 311
Reflection 287
Parallax 316
253% 305 fps
MRender 340
Gravity 248
Splatting 188
204% 259 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 209%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDBRPG0010BNC-WRSN 1TB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,017
Write 2,277
Mixed 1,699
447% 1,998 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 75.6
270% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,053
DQ Write 820
DQ Mixed 947
706% 940 MB/s
Poor: 182% Great: 351%
Apple APPLE SSD AP0256 251GB
5GB free
Firmware: 116.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,598
Write 2,183
Mixed 922
350% 1,568 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 46.7
220% 88.8 MB/s
DQ Read 953
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 505
386% 546 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK 64GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
103% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 55
MC Mixed 34.6
120% 41.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 10.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro7,1 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Apple MacPro7,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback