Samsung 550XCJ/550XCR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 550XCJ/550XCR  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP550XCJ-KF1BR
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 03 '21 at 22:20
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 128
2-Core 208
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 493
60% 457 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Sanyo(144D C834) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
5.75% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 7
Parallax 8.2
5% 7.13 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 9.9
7% 8.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.75%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme 512GB 512GB
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0214B0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 733 692 523 837 178 1198 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1487
Write 1,537
Mixed 998
SusWrite 693
264% 1,179 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 25.2
178% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 704
DQ Write 799
DQ Mixed 457
426% 653 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 186%
Great: 260%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
929GB free
Firmware: JU003F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 28 26 30 28 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 16.7
Write 98
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 34.8
32% 43.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.4
123% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 0194 SF4641G8CK8IEHLSBG 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 24.2
86% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 25.6
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550XCJ/550XCR Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 550XCJ/550XCR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback