Lenovo 3227AE2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3227AE2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121015
Uptime20.2 Days
Run DateJan 04 '21 at 01:38
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 190
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 368
49% 369 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Gigabyte(1458 3525) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.95
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.77% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.63 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.9
1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.77%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231706
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,917
Write 38
Mixed 76
279% 1,344 MB/s
4K Read 432
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 4.9
662% 146 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 HMT125U6DFR8C-H9 HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.3% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 17.1
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3227AE2 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3227AE2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $209
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback