Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory22.1 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201104
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 05 '21 at 15:37
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 119
2-Core 241
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 799
75% 623 Pts
64-Core 1,232
76% 1,232 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Asus(1043 0563) 2GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.23% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 2
2% 2.37 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 28
Splatting 24.8
21% 26.2 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 8.23%
Great: 22%
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1670 MHz, MLim: 985 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.6% Below average
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 11.7
8% 13.6 fps
MRender 93.1
Gravity 117
Splatting 77.2
77% 95.8 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$95
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 399 403 399 395 394 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 2,180
Write 1612
Mixed 1,369
SusWrite 413
310% 1,394 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 72.1
245% 85.2 MB/s
DQ Read 931
DQ Write 792
DQ Mixed 850
640% 858 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 227%
Great: 280%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 65 65 65 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 65.9
Write 63.9
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 65.3
42% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 40GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.6% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 28.8
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 20.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $976
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback