Today's hottest deals

MSI 990FXA-GD80 (MS-7640)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7640
MotherboardMSI 990FXA-GD80 (MS-7640)  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '21 at 07:17
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 69.9
2-Core 123
58% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 361
34% 283 Pts
64-Core 363
22% 363 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7750
MSI(1462 2792) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
7.79% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 14.5
7% 13.2 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 10.6
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.79%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESA3ASA2PSTBT240GB 240GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0114
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 182 70 84 72 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 286
Write 151
Mixed 232
SusWrite 127
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 19
74% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 26.2
DQ Write 74
DQ Mixed 25.6
27% 41.9 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 80%
USB DISK 3.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 17 16 17 16 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 124
Write 16.8
Mixed 12.1
SusWrite 16.4
39% 42.2 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
58% 4.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.8% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.2
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 12.1
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FXA-GD80 (MS-7640) Builds (Compare 190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 990FXA-GD80 (MS-7640) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $1,050
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback